Página 45 - SBP Consenso Cuidados Pele

Versão HTML básica

Consenso de cuidado com a pele do Recém nascido
45
Referências
1.
Bowa, K., et al., A controlled trial of three methods for neonatal circumcision in Lusaka, Zambia. J
Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 2013. 62(1): p. e1-6.
2.
Van Howe, R.S., Is neonatal circumcision clinically beneficial? Argument against. Nat Clin Pract Urol,
2009. 6(2): p. 74-5.
3.
Farley, S.J., Neonatal circumcision: the controversy rages on. Nat Clin Pract Urol, 2009. 6(2): p. 59.
4.
Castro, J.G., et al., Acceptability of neonatal circumcision by Hispanics in southern Florida. Int J STD
AIDS, 2010. 21(8): p. 591-4.
5.
Herschel, M., et al., Neonatal circumcision. Randomized trial of a sucrose pacifier for pain control.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 1998. 152(3): p. 279-84.
6.
Ademuyiwa, A.O. and C.O. Bode, Complications of neonatal circumcision: avoiding common pitfalls
in a common procedure. Afr J Paediatr Surg, 2009. 6(2): p. 134-6.
7.
Okeke, L.I., A.A. Asinobi, and O.S. Ikuerowo, Epidemiology of complications of male circumcision in
Ibadan, Nigeria. BMC Urol, 2006. 6: p. 21.
8.
Al-Abdi, S.Y., Petroleum jelly for prevention of post-circumcision meatal stenosis. J Clin Neonatol,
2013. 2(3): p. 113-4.
9.
Pieretti, R.V., A.M. Goldstein, and R. Pieretti-Vanmarcke, Late complications of newborn circumcision:
a common and avoidable problem. Pediatr Surg Int, 2010. 26(5): p. 515-8.
10.
Bennett, J., et al., Circumcision and neonatal tetanus: disclosure of risk and its reduction by topical
antibiotics. Int J Epidemiol, 1999. 28(2): p. 263-6.
11.
Bennett, J., et al., Protective effects of topical antimicrobials against neonatal tetanus. Int J Epidemiol,
1997. 26(4): p. 897-903.
12.
De, A.N.S., Topical antibiotic use and circumcision-associated neonatal tetanus: protective factor or
indicator of good wound care? Int J Epidemiol, 2000. 29(3): p. 600-1.
13.
Mahmoudi, H., Evaluation of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision. Urol J, 2005. 2(2): p.
86-8.